Posted on

“It’s Tradition” is not a very good reason to do something

“Tradition” is the least persuasive rationale for continuing to do something. Tradition as a reason is weak because its purpose is basically 1) to remind you of something positive you associate with the past and 2) to free you from having to think of a new way to do something. It is easily trumped by other reasons. Now, if tradition is the reason you do something, and there are no other compelling reasons NOT to do that thing, tradition may stand uninterrupted for a long time and be harmless. For example, why do I put up a Christmas tree in my house and decorate it with ornaments every year? Because it is a tradition, and there are no more compelling reasons why I do not. It’s pretty, it reminds me of past Christmases which I also enjoyed, and I don’t have to think about what to decorate my house with. It is even an artificial tree, so it literally doesn’t impact anyone other than the people in my house. It’s a different story if we are talking about a Christmas tree put up by city hall. In that case, you may now have different compelling reasons other than tradition. For example, it excludes people from other religions, or it violates the Constitution. Those other reasons are more important than tradition.

Other traditions can and should be easily trumped. Traditionally, brides wear white and grooms wear black. If you are a bride and groom and you like that, and have no reason to change, then great. Tradition it is. Again, it’s pretty, it reminds you of other weddings, and you don’t have to think about it. But really, any reason is a good enough reason to buck that tradition. For example, what if the bride or groom just likes tan suits better than black tuxedos? Tan suit wins, and out the door tradition goes. There may be other even more compelling reasons to buck wedding traditions. Traditionally, a bride marries a groom. Fine if you are a woman that wants to marry a man. But what if you are a woman that doesn’t want to marry a man, but want to marry a woman? Then that reason is more important than tradition. The tradeoff is that you have to think about how and why you are doing things differently. What should we wear? Two dresses? Two different color dresses? A dress and a suit? Two suits? What color suit, and why? It might be hard to have to think of new ways, but for a woman who wants to marry a woman, it is far more preferable to think about new things to wear than to throw up her hands and just marry a man because that is an existing tradition.
Same thing for team names. Tradition is a fine enough reason for the Giants and Dodgers, because there are no other compelling reasons for those not to be the names. No need to change the name of the Dodgers every year. However, for the Washington Football team, the argument is “it’s tradition” vs. “it’s racist.” Guess what? “It’s racist” is a much more compelling reason than tradition.

Same thing for the Confederate Flag. “It’s tradition,” which can be similarly expressed as “it represents pride for Southern history” loses out to other far more compelling reasons, the main one being that most black people see it as a continuing endorsement of the side that fought to keep black people slaves. Because of its connotations, racists still use it as a code identifier to other racists, and black people often feel threatened by those who fly it. Tradition should lose so hard on this one.

5 thoughts on ““It’s Tradition” is not a very good reason to do something

  1. I think that this resource is great (and I may use it in my critical thinking course). One correction I have is that you might want to rethink whether naturalnews.com counts as liberal. Though its title may sound that way, its content skews way right. This is from yesterday, for example: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-24-goodbye-obama-you-sleeper-cell-traitor-and-enemy-of-america.html
    Their news feed shows itself to be pro-trump and extremely anti-liberal.
    There is a fairly common misconception that anti-vaxxers tend to be liberals, but in my experience this is not the case. In my experience (which is actually fairly extensive on this issue) anti-vaxxers tend to be libertarian types, while liberals tend to give the nod to science. There are, of course, exceptions to those tendencies, but just because naturalnews.com is anti-vax definitely does not make it liberal. Take a look there and I think you will agree that it should be moved to the other side of the chart.
    Overall, thanks for this great and useful graphic.

    1. Moderator: Please remove the comment I just posted.
      I thought I was posting this under the post about the media graphic from two days ago (“High Resolution File Formats for Full Chart …,” 1/23/17). I will post it again there. Please remove this comment from this page if you still can. Sorry about that!

      1. Will do. Thanks!

    2. I agree. I have had several people make similar comments, with many saying that it could arguably on both sides. Some extremist conspiracy theories are hard to place as squarely left or right-wing. Many “anti-establishment” conspiracy theories, whether they are anti-government, anti-corporate, or anti-media, find fans on both extreme ends of the political spectrum. Thanks for the feedback.

  2. Are you familiar with this quote from Chesterton?

    “The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types — the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution.” -G.K. Chesterton, 1924

    Chesterton was a traditionalist who understood perfectly the absurdity both of doing something merely because that’s the way it’s always been done and shaking things up for no better reason.

    (I saw your now famous chart last month but at the time it was unsourced. Yesterday someone shared it me again and this time I saw the © symbol and tracked you down.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *